Sansberry Organizational Harm Institute™

A decade of research.
The framework organizations
need to address harm
at its source.

The Sansberry Organizational Harm Institute™ produces the field's most rigorous classification system for organizational harm, along with the diagnostic tools and practitioner credentials organizations need to move from recognition to structured, lasting response.

16Defined
Behaviors
5Harm
Clusters
10+Years
Field Research
The Institute

Built for the cases where
standard approaches
are not enough.

The research on toxic leadership, abusive supervision, and organizational dysfunction has existed for decades. What has not existed is a unified, forensic framework that organizations and practitioners can deploy with confidence in the field's most complex environments.

The Sansberry Organizational Harm Institute fills that gap. Every definition in the Organizational Harm Taxonomy™ meets standards of scholarly precision. Every tool and certification is immediately deployable in active field settings. Those two requirements are not in tension. They are the point.

Organizations that have run investigations, completed trainings, and updated policies, and watched the same patterns return, come to the Institute because the problem requires a different level of rigor than what those processes were built to deliver.

Institute Tagline

"The science of organizational harm. The methodology to stop it."

Sansberry Organizational Harm Institute™

People don't just survive organizational harm. They survive what happens when they report it. The Institute produces the tools and credentials that change what happens next.

The Framework

Organizational Harm
Taxonomy™ (OHT™)

The OHT™ is the first structured classification system to name and define the behavioral mechanisms through which organizations harm people, with each of the 16 behaviors documented at forensic precision and with its AI-enabled manifestation defined. It is the intellectual foundation of every Institute product, tool, and certification.

1Aggressive Domination Drives involuntary turnover, exposes the organization to legal liability, and erodes the psychological safety required for performance.
  • Aggressive Coercion
  • Threats as Control
  • Punitive Backlash
2Cognitive Manipulation Undermines decision quality, destroys trust in leadership, and produces the kind of disengagement that exit surveys cannot explain.
  • Reality Distortion
  • Deceptive Influence
  • Emotional Exploitation
  • Undermining Others
3Systemic Deprivation Suppresses the contribution of capable people, accelerates attrition, and concentrates institutional knowledge in the hands of those causing harm.
  • Access Control
  • Voice Suppression
  • Inequitable Treatment
4Social Suppression Produces hostile work environment liability, drives out the people organizations claim to want to retain, and signals to the broader workforce that belonging is conditional.
  • Social Devaluation
  • Cultural Coercion
  • Social Isolation
5Structural Entrenchment Converts isolated incidents into systemic patterns, shields perpetrators through institutional process, and makes the organization itself the mechanism of harm.
  • Dysfunctional Authority
  • Deliberate Ambiguity
  • Structural Protection

No existing organizational harm framework documents AI-enabled behavior at this level of specificity. The OHT™ is the first. Each behavior is mechanistically defined, giving organizations a shared language to move from recognition to structured action.

16Mechanistically defined behaviors, each with a documented AI-enabled manifestation
5Distinct clusters, each representing a separate mode of organizational harm
1Forensic framework built to hold up when institutions and leaders push back
What Organizations Gain

The infrastructure to address
harm at its source.

Organizations that work with the Institute gain more than a report or a training. They gain a classification system, a diagnostic methodology, and practitioners trained to deploy it, so the capacity to address harm becomes part of how the organization operates.

01

A Common Language for Harm

The OHT™ gives leadership, HR, legal, and practitioners a shared vocabulary precise enough to act on. Organizations move from vague discomfort to named, classifiable behavior, which changes what is possible in every conversation and decision that follows.

02

Root Cause Clarity

Harm recurs when organizations address incidents rather than sources. The OHT™ identifies the specific behavioral and structural mechanisms producing harm so that interventions reach the origin rather than the symptom, and stay effective once the engagement ends.

03

Not Engagement. Not Awareness.

Organizations come to the Institute because something remains unresolved after engagement programs have run. This work reaches the structural and behavioral sources those programs were not designed to address, because it was built specifically for that purpose.

04

Systems That Prevent Recurrence

The goal is not only to respond to harm. It is to give organizations the infrastructure to identify harm early, intervene with authority, and build the structural conditions that make recurrence harder over time.

What We Offer

Three ways to put the
framework to work.

Whether your organization needs diagnostic capacity, trained practitioners, or systems-level assessment tools, the Institute has a structured entry point. All three draw from the same foundational framework.

OHT™

Organizational Harm Taxonomy™

The classification system behind all Institute work. Sixteen behaviors across five clusters, each forensically defined with a documented AI-enabled manifestation. The foundation every practitioner and organization draws from when addressing harm with rigor.

Learn More
COHA™

Certified Organizational Harm Analyst™

A cohort-based practitioner certification for experienced HR consultants, workplace investigators, executive coaches, and mediators. Each module delivers a complete, deployable service offering. Six new billable specializations upon completion. Built for the cases where standard approaches fall short.

Learn About COHA™
Diagnostic Tools

Organizational Diagnostic Tools

OHT™-based diagnostic tools for individuals and organizations. Free tools give individuals language for what they are experiencing. Premium tools give organizations the systems-level infrastructure to identify harm patterns, assess conditions, and build response capacity.

Explore the Tools
The Founder

Dr. Kevin Sansberry II

Organizational Behavior Scholar · Founder

Dr. Kevin Sansberry II is an organizational behavior scholar, doctoral practitioner, and the developer of the Organizational Harm Taxonomy™. He holds a Doctor of Business Administration in Organizational Behavior and has spent nearly a decade consulting with organizations on the behavioral and structural conditions that produce harm, dysfunction, and coercive control.

His published research addresses abusive supervision and CEO narcissism. His dissertation examined the concealment of identity under abusive supervision and became the basis for a TEDx talk of the same name. He is the founder of KEVRA: The Culture Company and the host of the Toxic Leadership Podcast.

He founded the Institute on a single conviction: that practitioners and organizations working inside harmful environments deserve tools as rigorous as the problems they face.

Dr. Kevin Sansberry II
DBA · Organizational Behavior
DBA, Organizational Behavior
MBA, Leadership & Change
BS, Psychology
TEDx Speaker
Host, Toxic Leadership Podcast
Founder, KEVRA: The Culture Company
Advanced Hogan Certification
Research: Abusive Supervision & CEO Narcissism
Get Started

Ready to learn more
about what we do?

The Institute works with organizations, practitioners, and researchers who are ready to address organizational harm with the level of rigor the problem demands.